+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

Graphical representation of causal effects

What If: Chapter 6

Elena Dudukina

2021-01-11

1 / 16

Draw your assumptions before your conclusions

  • Causal diagrams
  • Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs)

2 / 16

DAGs

Arah, O. A. 2008. “The Role of Causal Reasoning in Understanding Simpson’s Paradox, Lord’s Paradox, and the Suppression Effect: Covariate Selection in the Analysis of Observational Studies.” Emerg Themes Epidemiol 5 (February): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-5

3 / 16

DAGs

Arah, O. A. 2008. “The Role of Causal Reasoning in Understanding Simpson’s Paradox, Lord’s Paradox, and the Suppression Effect: Covariate Selection in the Analysis of Observational Studies.” Emerg Themes Epidemiol 5 (February): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-5

4 / 16

When we observe a statistical association between two variables

1) Two variables are a cause and the consequence

5 / 16

When we observe a statistical association between two variables

1) Two variables are a cause and the consequence

2) Two variables have a common cause (a confounder)

  • A and Y are associated even though A does not cause Y
  • Example: L - smoking, A - carrying a lighter, Y - lung cancer

5 / 16

When we observe a statistical association between two variables

3) Two variables share a common consequence or a child of a common consequence, which was conditioned on

  • E and D are associated even though E does not cause D (or vice versa)

Hernán, Miguel A., Sonia Hernández-Díaz, and James M. Robins. 2004. “A Structural Approach to Selection Bias.” Epidemiology 15 (5): 615–25

6 / 16

Associatioin vs Causation

  • "Association, unlike causation, is a symmetric relationship between two variables; thus, when present, association flows between two variables regardless of the direction of the causal arrows"
7 / 16

Associatioin vs Causation

  • "Association, unlike causation, is a symmetric relationship between two variables; thus, when present, association flows between two variables regardless of the direction of the causal arrows"

  • Association is not causation

7 / 16

Marginal vs conditional probabilities

  • Conditional
    • The probability that an event Y occurs, given we know some other event A has occurred, is the conditional probability of Y given A
    • Pr(Y|A)
  • Marginal(unconditional)
    • Pr(Y)
    • Remembering standardization/adjustment formula
      • Pr(Ya)=ΣlPr(Y=1|A=a,L=l)Pr(L=l)
      • Probability of PO Ya marginal over confounder L

Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. Judea Pearl, Madelyn Glymour, Nicholas P. Jewell

8 / 16

  • A⊥⊥Y|B
  • A⊥̸⊥̸Y
9 / 16

Conditioning

  • A⊥⊥Y|L

  • A⊥̸⊥̸Y|L

10 / 16

Biasing path

For the association between A and Y

  • A --> [L] <--Y

11 / 16

Backdoor path

  • A <-- L --> Y

12 / 16

Exchangeability, positivity, consistency

inference is never assumption-free

13 / 16

Systematic bias

  • Infinite sample size won't help eliminating systematic bias
  • The magnitude of the effect is off
  • Structural definition of bias

    • Common causes --> confounding

    • Conditioning on common effects --> selection bias (collider stratification bias)

    • Information (measurement) error --> later in the book
14 / 16

Effect modification structure

  • Causal vs surrogate efect modifiers

  • Structure of the association of the effect modifier with the outcome matters
15 / 16

Interaction in DAGs

  • Augmented DAGs
16 / 16

Draw your assumptions before your conclusions

  • Causal diagrams
  • Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs)

2 / 16
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow